As part of the internship program in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication, we ask each professional supervisor to evaluate the intern's performance. The internship is graded either satisfactory or unsatisfactory, and your evaluation will help determine the grade. The information you give us on this form is confidential, however, we generally share the tone of the evaluation with the student. If you wish to write us a confidential note in addition to the evaluation, please feel free to do so.
The "comments" section at the end is especially important because it will help us prepare future interns.
Please rank the intern from 1 (not acceptable) to 5 (excellent) in each of the areas listed. Choose not applicable if it is not applicable. If you wish to remove one of the multiple choice answers, click the reset button at the end of the form (this removes all of the form's answers). If you would prefer to print out the form, fill it out and mail it or fax it, please download the PDF file here. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to acquire this form online. Company
Supervisor Last Name First Name
Name of Evaluator Last Name First Name
Title
Email
Student you are evaluating 0.130434782608696, vxankiyu 0.166666666666667, tcjksstyl 0.185185185185185, vrtwlziv 0.1875, opzhtqivm 0.241379310344828, qrxdnfkxk 0.266666666666667, bcwyve 0.3, mqptnk 0.526315789473684, oupmfnjbv 1, elgeufvgu 1, mlsfgvojc 1.1, rtluklmfl ajmayji, ajmayji Artman, Amanda Bailey, Eric Ballash, Elizabeth Barnes, Allison Battin, Reed Bauch, Patrick Bawtinhimer, Lindsay Beach, Brandon Bensi, Patrick Billinghurst, Angela Bond, Kara Borrero, Brittni Brown, Adam Brown, Jennifer Brown, Sarah Buehler, Kristen Byers, Marianna Callahan, Michael Calvin, Katherine Chimney, Mary Clark, Heather Cowen, Brittany Cowsert, Bradley Cropley, Melissa Dadisman, Ariane Decker, Kathrine Delia, August Demko, Courtney Deshler, Jylanna Devin, Keaney Dickman, Danielle DiMiero, Thomas Dinovo, Gina Dreger, Angela Evans, Bryan Evans, David Fertig, Katherine Firestone, Sarah Fittipaldo, Gayl Fleming, Anna Friedman, Brett Gandee, Dan Gee, Ryan Glymph, Brian Goehrig, Caitlin Goldberg, Jamie Gross, Scott Hanolt, Edward Harbin, Chanelle Hawk, Jason Heeley, Kira Herbst, John Hofstetter, Ashley Honabarger, Julie Hoy, Deanna Huberty, Tricia Hudson, Erika Jasterbowski, Jeffrey jernejec, adam Jones, Amanda Keaney, Devin Kirby, Brian Komarek, Kevin Kozel, Brian Krumpe, Erin Lara, Jackie Lawton, Katherine LePore, Kristin Levering, Charity Litvin, Jill Marginian, Carly Marti, Josh Meeks, Andrew Miller, Beau Minbiole, Marianne Miracle, Tesa Mitchell, Tara Monschein, Rose Morgan, Lindsey Murray, Heather Musar, Amanda Nemethy, Sophie nghhgei, nghhgei Nied, Benjamin Nypaver, Kristen O'Neill, Erin Palovsky, Megan Pavkov, Carson Pennza, Stefanie Peters, Emily Petro, Arthur Piri , Bomo Price, Lisa Prochaska, Tom Reaver, Hayley Regan, Bridget reynolds, thomas Ridgill, Mark Rodgers, Meghan Roman, Sarah Roy, Kathleen Royal, Sarah salopek, thomas Sargent, Nathan Satow, Nicholas Scheip, Matt Schneider, Rachel Simons, Eric Skal, Jeffrey Skutt, Jason Smith, Katrina Smith, Kimberly Smithberger, Adam Sonntag, Danielle Stewart, Kristen Straka, Chris Strode, Shay Sullivan, Brandon Takacs, Joseph Taylor, Steve Thompson, Brittany Troutman, Josh Williams, Christine Williams, Jessica Willis, Donielle Yavasoglu, Nicole Yuhasz, Lindsay Ziek, Kathryn
Date of Internship Select Spring (Jan - May) Summer (June - July) Fall (Aug - Dec) Select 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
A. Performance
1. The student demonstrated an understanding of the work to be performed. Not Applicable 5 Excellent 4 3 2 1 Unacceptable
2. The student understood how to operate necessary equipment or learned within an acceptable time. Not Applicable 5 Excellent 4 3 2 1 Unacceptable
3. The student was punctual in his/her arrival at work and assigned duties. Not Applicable 5 Excellent 4 3 2 1 Unacceptable
4. The student’s demeanor, conduct and dress were appropriate. Not Applicable 5 Excellent 4 3 2 1 Unacceptable
5. Contacts with other employees and non-employees were handled in a professional manner. Not Applicable 5 Excellent 4 3 2 1 Unacceptable
B. DUTIES/SKILLS
1. The student showed an acceptable command of spelling, grammar, and punctuation in his/her writing. Not Applicable 5 Excellent 4 3 2 1 Unacceptable
2. The student’s writing skills were equal to the demands of the assignments. Not Applicable 5 Excellent 4 3 2 1 Unacceptable
3.The student’s editing skills were equal to the demands of the assignments. Not Applicable 5 Excellent 4 3 2 1 Unacceptable
4.The student demonstrated good problem solving skills. Not Applicable 5 Excellent 4 3 2 1 Unacceptable
5. The student demonstrated good production skills. Not Applicable 5 Excellent 4 3 2 1 Unacceptable
6. The student demonstrated an acceptable understanding of job requirements. Not Applicable 5 Excellent 4 3 2 1 Unacceptable
7. The student consistently met deadlines. Not Applicable 5 Excellent 4 3 2 1 Unacceptable
8.The student budgeted time effectively in handling assignments. Not Applicable 5 Excellent 4 3 2 1 Unacceptable
C. COMMENTS
Strengths
Weaknesses
Other Comments