As part of the internship program in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication, we ask each professional supervisor to evaluate the intern's performance. The internship is graded either satisfactory or unsatisfactory, and your evaluation will help determine the grade. The information you give us on this form is confidential; However, we generally share the tone of the evaluation with the student. If you wish to write us a confidential note in addition to the evaluation, please feel free to do so.
The "comments" section at the end is especially important because it will help us prepare future interns.
Please rank the intern from 1 (not acceptable) to 5 (excellent) in each of the areas listed. Choose not applicable if it is not applicable. If you wish to remove one of the multiple choice answers, click the reset button at the end of the form (this removes all of the form's answers). Company
Supervisor Last Name First Name
Name of Evaluator Last Name First Name
Title
Email
Student you are evaluating 00TEST FROM MAYANK, PLEASE_IGNORE1ARNETTE, OLIVIABATTAH, NOURHANBeaman, BritneyBECK, CASSANDRABrookes, AllisonCAMPBELL, KATICAMPBELL, REBECCACampbell, KatiCARTER, SHAUNACassudakis, ChelseaChamp, ChampCHAVEZ, TRENTONCheckal, RobertCHINCHAR, SASHACHRISTOFARIS, NATHANClevenger, JasonCLLEOPATRA, CLLEOPATRACOLLINS, RYANCONFER, MEGANConner, AlyssaCorbut, KatherineCostello, JessicaCountryman, EllenCrilley, ThomasDavala, LisaDELSANTER, NICOLEDorfman, MargaretDrummond, CarolynDUNGAN, CANDICEDunick, Megan Eighmey, AllysonEighmey, AllysonEISENBREI, MARISSAETZEL, MADALYNFAHEY, KASEYFICKLE, KATIEGalloway, MorganGarland, KatherineGARLICK, WEZLEYGARVEY, MARY KATHERINEGennarelli, NicoleGRAENING, EVANGRIFFITH, CONNORGulasy, LisaHAMNER, HANNAHHaskins, AubreyHEDMAN, JENNAilqvic, ilqvicJames, SarahJames, SarahJOHNSON, AUBREYJORDAN, BENJAMINKaufman, AaronKEITH, SIDNEYKennedy, KatieKirtner, EllenKlitsch, AmandaKrystallynn, KrystallynnLack, SarahLADOIA, MAYANKLAUR, SHANNENLYNDSEY, SAGERMacchiarola, BrittanyMarylada, MaryladaMathias, StephanieMCCALLUM, KYLEMCNEAL, PAIGEMohr, RebeccaMorgan, ChristineNeumann, StephanieNisson, NicoleNorris, TylerNORTH, MATTHEWO'Brien , Kristen Orsini, ErinPAUKST , KATHLEENPENDERGAST, HALLIEPetersen, SaraPolchek, RachelProfitt, IssacREFFEL, BREANNA Ridinger, LindsaySpaulding, SarahSTAINBROOK, RYAN STEPHANIE, BLACK TEST LADOIA, TEST MAYANKTEST_LADOIA, TEST_MAYANKThomas, HeatherThomas, DarianTITUS, TAYLORTOMKINS, MEGANVANJO, ERINVogel, LaurenWARWICK, DIANNAWINKLEMAN, NICOLEWRITE, MICHAELAYokley, JenniferYoung, Katie
Date of Internship Select Spring (Jan - May) Summer (June - July) Fall (Aug - Dec) Select 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
A. Performance
1. The student demonstrated an understanding of the work to be performed. N/A 1 Not Acceptable 2 3 4 5 Excellent
2. The student understood how to operate necessary equipment or learned within an acceptable time. N/A 1 Not Acceptable 2 3 4 5 Excellent
3. The student was punctual in his/her arrival at work and assigned duties. N/A 1 Not Acceptable 2 3 4 5 Excellent
4. The student’s demeanor, conduct and dress were appropriate. N/A 1 Not Acceptable 2 3 4 5 Excellent
5. Contacts with other employees and non-employees were handled in a professional manner. N/A 1 Not Acceptable 2 3 4 5 Excellent
B. DUTIES/SKILLS
1. The student showed an acceptable command of spelling, grammar, and punctuation in his/her writing. N/A 1 Not Acceptable 2 3 4 5 Excellent
2. The student’s writing skills were equal to the demands of the assignments. N/A 1 Not Acceptable 2 3 4 5 Excellent
3.The student’s editing skills were equal to the demands of the assignments. N/A 1 Not Acceptable 2 3 4 5 Excellent
4.The student demonstrated good problem solving skills. N/A 1 Not Acceptable 2 3 4 5 Excellent
5. The student demonstrated good production skills. N/A 1 Not Acceptable 2 3 4 5 Excellent
6. The student demonstrated an acceptable understanding of job requirements. N/A 1 Not Acceptable 2 3 4 5 Excellent
7. The student consistently met deadlines. N/A 1 Not Acceptable 2 3 4 5 Excellent
8.The student budgeted time effectively in handling assignments. N/A 1 Not Acceptable 2 3 4 5 Excellent
C. COMMENTS
Strengths
Weaknesses
Other Comments
Note: Carefully enter the code below. Your information will not be submitted if the code is not entered correctly. You will have to refill complete form if incorrect captcha is entered.
Click Refresh Image if you cannot read the code.
.
