Howard I. Finberg, Poynter interactive learning director, says deregulation and convergence are separate issues. The definition of “convergence,” he says, is determined by your vantage point.

What if the vantage point is democracy?

Is this a matter of clarifying terminology as Finberg says?

Convergence fanfare rings loudly through the industry these days. Deeper coverage. New toys and technology to deliver content. Multiple revenue streams!

NEW MEDIA NEGATIVES?

What about the macro picture? How’s all this stuff affect the media watchdog role?

Are there negatives to all of this on the larger level?

Although it’s hard to find admitted deregulation proponents, most large media management types would argue deregulation improves democracy. The argument being a NewsCenter can produce news coverage more efficiently and create a stronger voice.

Opponents of media consolidation, such as Common Cause, say democracy relies on a number of diverse and independent media outlets.

And journalists seem swept up in the day-to-day duties of working in a convergent operation.

I’m not sure I know where I fall into the debate anymore.

INTRIGUED BUT CONCERNED

On one hand, I’m incredibly intrigued by the possibilities of convergence. It’s an exciting time to work in this business.

But consider the NewsCenter model in large metropolitan market like Tampa. Can one outlet really provide its civic duty as a watchdog on the local level?

Additionally, can reporters realistically dig deeper into an important story when they’re also expected to edit video and do standups by 5 p.m.?

Is it realistic to think reporters can achieve all of this in a workday, and for the same paycheck as before?

Is democracy hindered in such a situation?

I think the answer might be one of self-inspection. Media management types need to keep a close eye on the proverbial “forest.” It’s easy to stay focused on the “trees” of budgets, technology, training and content delivery these days.

After all, convergence is a rapidly evolving idea.  And most of us could probably agree that’s something media managers need to keep in mind.

My question is, can media evolution equate to de-evolution of democracy?